@article{gklpf-inpmm-21,
  author = {Cenk G{\"u}ndogan and Peter Kietzmann and Martine S. Lenders and Hauke Petersen and Michael Frey and Thomas C. Schmidt and Felix Shzu-Juraschek and Matthias W{\"a}hlisch},
  title = {{The Impact of Networking Protocols on Massive M2M Communication in the Industrial IoT}},
  journal = {IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management (TNSM)},
  year = {2021},
  month = {December},
  volume = {18},
  number = {4},
  pages = {4814--4828},
  publisher = {IEEE},
  address = {Piscataway, NJ, USA},
  abstract = {Common use cases in the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) deploy massive amounts of sensors and actuators that communicate with each other or to a remote cloud. While they form too large and too volatile networks to run on ultra-reliable, time-synchronized low-latency channels, participants still require reliability and latency guaranties. We elaborate this for safety-critical use cases. This paper focuses on the effects of networking protocols for industrial communication services. It analyzes and compares the traditional Message Queuing Telemetry Transport for Sensor Networks (MQTT-SN) with the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) as a current IETF recommendation, and also with emerging Information-centric Networking (ICN) approaches, which are ready for deployment. Our findings indicate a rather diverse picture with a large dependence on deployment: Publish-subscribe protocols are more versatile, whereas ICN protocols are more robust in multi-hop environments. MQTT-SN competitively claims resources on congested links, while CoAP politely coexists on the price of its performance.},
  file = {../papers/gklpf-inpmm-21.pdf},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2021.3089549},
  theme = {iot|icn},
}